#Tactical soccer analysis free#
Although a match can produce a plethora of insights, he concentrates “on three main tactical points in the match in order to keep the content concise and manageable.” With the free time allotted by his double speed analysis, he goes back and watches the match again (once more on 2x speed). Only after this initial tactical analysis does Lee begin to craft his article. Like Benoit, Lee likes to “look at how each team attacks, how they defend and how they transition from defence to attack and attack to defence.” This obviously allows him to get through the game quicker, but still gives him the opportunity to take notes on certain phases of play. “When I analyse a match I tend to watch it on double speed,” remarked Lee. Site director Lee Scott varies drastically in his approach to match analysis. His goal is firstly to grasp how each team wants to play, “and then look for eventual changes in how they play throughout the 90 minutes (substitutions, target areas, opposition players they mark, formation changes, etc.).” David noted that his UEFA B coaching course was a major influence on this type of tactical analysis. Picture from David’s piece, Maurizio Sarri at Chelsea.ĭavid repeats this fifteen-minute sectional analysis throughout the match. For the next fifteen minutes period I look at the game in a similar way, and then it’s easy to notice changes in how the two teams play.” “I spend the first fifteen minutes looking at how both teams attack, how they defend collectively and how they act in both transitions. “I divide the game up into 15 minute periods,” says David. This is not only the case with his article choices (a great piece on football fitness stands out) but also in the way he goes about watching matches.
#Tactical soccer analysis professional#
It’s quite simple during game time I prefer to concentrate on the game instead of miss out an important phase.”ĭavid Selini is currently a professional coach, something made apparent by his analytical style. “Each time I see an interesting gameplan or a built action, I note the timestamp and some details about it. He doesn’t try to do any on-the-spot analysis of complex plays. Once the referee blows his whistle, though, the methodical inquiry is over. Writing about an unfamiliar squad will require prior research to truly grasp their motives.Īfter his pre-match research, Benoit looks at the lineups and thinks about how each side will attack the other. It’s so much easier to analyse teams you support or watch often because you know what to expect.
“Before the match starts,” Benoit wrote me, “I go on WhoScored to see the last five lineups for both teams and look at the news to refresh my memory about the teams.” This calls up the concept of familiarity. For him, preparation is key and repetition is necessary. The tactical analysis of football is almost completely subjective.īenoit Pimpaud has a style of analysis I find very comparable to my own. Yet another may remark about player interactions off the ball. Another will discuss the use of defensive organization as a form of attack. One may focus on how a manager used his defenders to build from the back. If you take 100 analysts, put them in a room showing any old football match, and ask them for their thoughts, you’ll get 100 different answers.